English Academic Data
The adjacent datasummarizes the findings for students who took the entrance and exit baseline English assessments. Most students showed gains.
|
| Percent of students that showed improvement | 56% |
| Percent of students that gained at least 10% | 25% |
| Percent of students that gained at least 15% | 19% |
| Percent of students that gained at least 20% | 8% |
One out every four students gained 10% or more.
|
Math Academic Data
The adjacent data summarizes the findings for students who took the entrance and exit baseline Math assessments.
|
| Percent of students that showed improvement | 58% |
| Percent of students that gained at least 10% | 36% |
| Percent of students that gained at least 15% | 17% |
| Percent of students that gained at least 20% | 7% |
Most students showed gains. 36% of the students gained 10% or more.
|
|
Social Skills Behaviour Rating Scale
Peer Interactions
58% of the students often or always make friends easily
More students (+9%) respond well to good- natured teasing
61% of the students get along with others who are different
More students (+8%) volunteer to help their peers
61% of the students can stand up for themselves with their peers
Work Habits
More students (+6%) use their free time appropriately
More students (+6%) finish their school work on time
More students (+5%) follow instructions carefully
More students (+9%) can cope with embarrassing moments
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory
Categories and ranges.
|
| Normal | 58% |
| Mild Mood Disturbance | 11-16 |
| Borderline Clinical Depression | 17-20 |
| Moderate Depression | 21-30 |
| Severe Depression | 31-40 |
| Extreme Depression | +40 |
Mean and Standard Deviation
|
The mean before the program is at the high end of the mild mood disturbance category; just one point below the borderline clinical depression category.
The mean after the program is at the low end of the mild mood disturbance category; just one point above the normal category.
|
Beck Depression Inventory
All JIPP Cohorts have increased the percent of students in the "Normal" category by the end of their respective programs.
|
| Percent of students in the "normal" category before JIP Program | 35% | 31% | 37% | 38% |
| Percent of students in the "normal" category after JIP Program | 74% | 75% | 58% | 67% |
| Increase in percent of "normal" students | 39% | 44% | 21% | 29% |
